Notice of the tradition of Blessed Prophet ﷺ part 4
That is the point at which these refined men needed to isolate Twalit. They didn't need legacy. Then, at that point, what was the complaint of Hazrat Umar, obviously there was no issue in that everybody had a different Tulaat Nama. He would circulate his produce at some point or another as indicated by his viewpoint. The justification for this has been seen by the researchers that for this situation there was plausible of turning into a legacy later and there would be extension for thinking that Hazrat Umar returned to his most memorable choice on the grounds that the legacy was split between the two. It is the little girl's portion and a big part of the uncle's expected to being an Asaba. Consequently, on the off chance that Hazrat Umar had endorsed this choice, this choice of Hazrat Umar would have turned into an endlessly evidence for the legacy of this property to the people who came later. (5) Albeit at first the assessment of these decent individuals from the Ahl al-Bayt was that this is a heritage and for that reason it was requested from the noteworthy Sheikhs, however in the end the assessment of these noble men likewise concurred with the assessment of the Sheikhs. For that reason Hazrat Ali Karamullah Rabiyyah kept it as it was during his caliphate, in any case assuming he considered it as a heritage, he would have separated it during his caliphate. At the outset, Hazrat Abbas and Hazrat Ali had a joint tulit. During the caliphate of Hazrat Uthman, Hazrat Abbas isolated from him. Hazrat Ali Karamullah alone stayed in the ownership of Rabiyyah, then Hazrat Hasan, then, at that point, Hazrat Hussain, then, at that point, Ali canister Hussain. (Fath al-Bari) These couple of fundamental realities have been momentarily referenced about this story. Aside from them, there are different realities in it which have been overlooked because of quickness. Hazrat Aisha says that the Blessed Prophet ﷺ didn't leave a dinar, nor a dirham, nor a goat, nor a camel. The storyteller says that I questioned the notice of endlessly slave that Hazrat Aisha had likewise said that neither slave nor slave. Q: A copyist was confounded in this hadith. For that reason he cautioned. In different customs, it is determined that neither slave nor slave
