Notice of the tradition of Blessed Prophet ﷺ part 3
From that point forward, I thought it fitting to hand it over to you as a watchman. So I made a vow from you that you will execute it similarly that Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq did. For a really long time I have been humble, you acknowledged it and consequently I alluded it to you, I'm asking you. Did I not allude similarly? This party likewise let it out. Furthermore, these two men of honor likewise let it be known. After that Hazrat Umar said that now you need to go with a choice against him. By the One by whose order the sky and the earth are laid out, I won't ever rule against him. On the off chance that you can't oversee it, return it to me. I .. I will oversee myself. This is the boring tale referenced by Imam Tirmidhi. This hadith is a boring tale. (1) Hazrat Abbas depicted Hazrat Ali Karamullah Rabiyyah as domineering and without words and there was an unforgiving discussion between the two honorable men. This thing appears to be far-fetched, yet for one thing Hazrat Abbas is the uncle of Hazrat Ali Karamullah Rabiyyah. In this limit, he has the privilege to caution. Then again, when they are thinking about Hazrat Ali Karam Allah as unfair, the subtleties of which are coming up, then, at that point, their activities ought to be considered as abuse. (2) That when Hazrat Abbas and Hazrat Ali knew this hadith as they owned up to the subject of Hazrat Umar, why did they request it from Hazrat Abu Bakr and for what reason did they request it from Hazrat Umar and on the off chance that it is acknowledged, it ought to be done in advance. It is additionally known. It was known from what Hazrat Abu Bakr PK said, then, at that point, Hazrat Abu Bakr had proactively denied on account of this hadith, so for what reason did he ask Hazrat Umar once more? The response is that this hadith was unquestionably known to him, yet clearly he thought about this hadith extraordinary. For instance, I think it is explicit with dirhams and dinars. As they have been referenced in a past hadith. For this situation, the principal question to Hazrat Abu Bakr ought to be as per the possibility that these respectable men believed it to be extraordinary, and afterward again in the hour of Hazrat Umar's caliphate, the inquiry ought to be with the possibility that perhaps Hazrat Umar The assessment of the two of them is pleasing. That is, Hazrat Umar additionally thinks of it as exceptional. However, after the interest, it was observed that the assessment of Hazrat Umar is equivalent to that of any remaining researchers, and the expressions of the hadith likewise show that Bidarshad incorporates all things and isn't restrictive to anything. One more significant thing ought to be noted here that when we ponder the sheikhs that they were pardoned and compelled to disseminate the legacy because of the blessed expressions of the Heavenly Prophet ﷺ, and in spite of the demand of these noble men, they didn't circulate it. It is likewise vital that any sort of doubt in the distinction of these Akbars, when they more than once demanded on account of abundance and needed activity against this reasonable and express assertion of the Sacred Prophet ﷺ, is very discourteous. Their demand was because of the way that these men of honor thought of it as a Shariah right. Thus, he used to deny the individuals who went against him for being against his examination. Which Hazrat Umar displayed by his discourse that you believed Hazrat Abu Bakr to be fussy. (3) That when Hazrat Abu Bakr and Hazrat Umar Baid rejected and upon the assertion of the Heavenly Prophet (harmony arrive) that we have no beneficiaries. These two courteous fellows had taken their region collectively, so presently what is the justification behind the contention between them, because of which the turn of the high position occurred among them and presently there was a solicitation for division for reasons unknown. While the division has previously been denied. The justification behind this is that this thing has turned into a right that legacy doesn't go on in it. For that reason the sheikhs likewise rejected and these noble men additionally acknowledged it. The justification behind the interest was that my dad had expressed that there were continuous conflicts between the two men regarding spending. Hazrat Abbas was extremely coordinated and clever. He was far-located. He needed to spend each abundance cautiously and needed to save investment funds and holds for the events of need. As per the style of ﷺ who needed to be circulated quickly with the goal that not so much as a dirham was left. Because of this explanation, there was consistently pressure between the two men. Hafiz Ibn Hajar has cited in Fath al-Bari from the custom of Darqutani that the conflict between these honorable men was not about legacy. Rather, the weight of endlessly spending. . I was considering how to spend this creation. Imam Abu Dawud has composed that the solicitation of these two noble men to partition this property in half was not an interest for legacy after the expression of the Heavenly Prophet. .
